The scope of this Technical Report is an informative document to identify potential critical liability issues that C-ITS<\/i> service provision may introduce; to consider strategies for how to control, limit or mitigate such liability issues; and to give pointers, where appropriate, to standards deliverables existing that provide specifications for all or some of these aspects, and to limit the risk of exposure to the financial consequences of liability issues.<\/p>\n
The objective of this Technical Report is to raise awareness of and consideration of such issues. This Technical Report does not provide specifications for solutions of these issues.<\/p>\n
| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7<\/td>\n | Foreword <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 9<\/td>\n | Introduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 10<\/td>\n | 1\tScope 2\tTerms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 11<\/td>\n | 3\tAbbreviations and acronyms <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 12<\/td>\n | 4\tHow to use this Technical Report 4.1\tAcknowledgement 4.2\tGuidance 4.3\tC-ITS \u2018Liability\u2019 aspects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 14<\/td>\n | 5\tWhat are the key liability issues 5.1\tEffects of different types of C-ITS applications technology risk <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 15<\/td>\n | 5.2\tCrash causation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 16<\/td>\n | 5.3\tTypes of parties in C-ITS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 17<\/td>\n | 5.4\tHuman factors 5.5\tWhat is the standard of safety expected? 6\tLegal Status 6.1\tRegional and National variations 6.1.1\tGeneral <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 18<\/td>\n | 6.1.2\tEurope 6.1.3\tUSA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 19<\/td>\n | 6.1.4\tAustralia 6.1.5\tChina 6.1.6\tJapan 6.1.7\tOther Countries 6.2\tDriver remains in charge <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 20<\/td>\n | 6.3\tTort 6.3.1\tGeneral issues regarding \u2018tort\u2019 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 21<\/td>\n | 6.3.2\tConsequences of \u2018breach of duty\u2019 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 22<\/td>\n | 6.3.3\tContract law 6.4\tProduct liability 6.5\tCompulsory third party systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 23<\/td>\n | 7\tPolicy questions and options 7.1\tGeneral 7.2\tOption 1: Continue current approach 7.3\tOption 2: Enact specific C-ITS liability laws to clarify issues 7.4\tOption 3: Non-legislative approaches <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 24<\/td>\n | 7.5\tOption 4: Information and education campaigns 8\tC-ITS Actors and Liability 8.1\tC-ITS and jurisdictions 8.2\tC-ITS and road operators\/managers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 25<\/td>\n | 8.3\tC-ITS and manufacturers 8.4\tC-ITS information\/application service providers 8.5\tC-ITS and drivers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 26<\/td>\n | 9\tSummary of findings 9.1\tGeneral 9.2\tExplicit regulation by jurisdictions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 27<\/td>\n | 9.3\t\u2018Opt-in\u2019 to service provision 9.4\tAdvisory systems\u00a0\u2014 Driver remains in charge 9.5\tInterventionist systems 9.6\tService providers need to make users aware and limit risks through \u2018opt-in\u2019 conditions of use 9.7\tManufacturers need to test thoroughly and have explicit conditions of use 9.8\tNeed for \u2018audit trail\u2019 9.9\tMinimize the points of opportunity of failure 9.10\tAdvise driver of status of systems 9.11\tHuman factor considerations will be critical <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 28<\/td>\n | 9.12\tRoad managers need to assess and manage risk implications 9.13\tExpectations will change 9.14\tClear guidance and regulation required 9.15\tDriver training <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 29<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Intelligent transport systems. Cooperative ITS – Liability aspects<\/b><\/p>\n |