{"id":422610,"date":"2024-10-20T06:42:03","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T06:42:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bsi-pd-iec-tr-61191-72020-2\/"},"modified":"2024-10-26T12:33:36","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T12:33:36","slug":"bsi-pd-iec-tr-61191-72020-2","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bsi-pd-iec-tr-61191-72020-2\/","title":{"rendered":"BSI PD IEC TR 61191-7:2020"},"content":{"rendered":"
This part of IEC 61191 serves as a Technical Report and provides information, how technical cleanliness can be assessed within the electronics assembly industry. Technical cleanliness concerns sources, analysis, reduction and control as well as associated risks of particulate matter, so-called foreign-object debris, on components and electronic assemblies in the electronics industry.<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2<\/td>\n | undefined <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
4<\/td>\n | CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | INTRODUCTION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions 4 Technical cleanliness 4.1 What is technical cleanliness? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | 4.2 History \u2013 standardisation of technical cleanliness 4.3 Technical cleanliness in the electronics industry 4.4 Potential particle-related malfunctions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | 5 Technical cleanliness as a challenge for the supply chain 5.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | 5.2 Contamination 5.2.1 Definition of particles 5.2.2 Definition of fibres <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | 5.3 Test procedure to determine technical cleanliness 5.3.1 Fundamentals <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | 5.3.2 Clarification form Figures Figure 1 \u2013 Test method as per VDA 19 Part 1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | 5.3.3 System technology Figure 2 \u2013 Examples of extraction systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | 5.3.4 Process parameters for pressure rinsing extraction 5.3.5 Pressure rinsing process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
22<\/td>\n | 5.3.6 Preparing membrane filters for measurement analysis Figure 3 \u2013 Component holder during manual pressure rinsing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | Figure 4 \u2013 Examples of different options for drying membrane filters Figure 5 \u2013 Slide frame with membrane filter <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | 5.4 Measurement analysis 5.5 Evaluating the results of cleanliness analyses 5.5.1 Overview <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
25<\/td>\n | 5.5.2 Particle count relative to component surface <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | 5.5.3 Procedure for violation of action control limits Figure 6 \u2013 Example procedure if specifications are exceeded Tables Table 1 \u2013 Influence of the blank value on the measurement results for different material surfaces (examples for a blank value fraction of 2,2 % and above) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | 5.6 Extended risk assessment 5.6.1 General 5.6.2 Example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
28<\/td>\n | Figure 7 \u2013 Particle size distribution and corresponding process capability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | 5.7 Component cleanliness \u2013 Data management and visualization 5.7.1 Component cleanliness analysis \u2013 flow diagram Figure 8 \u2013 Flow diagram for component cleanliness analysis Figure 9 \u2013 Scope of analytical report <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | 5.7.2 Explanation of SCI (Surface Cleanliness Index) Figure 10 \u2013 Derivation of Illig value <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
31<\/td>\n | Figure 11 \u2013 Derivation of SCI <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
32<\/td>\n | Figure 12 \u2013 Evaluation of 7-pin HV strip connector Figure 13 \u2013 Graph showing cleaning effect based on SCIs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
33<\/td>\n | 5.7.3 Creating a database Figure 14 \u2013 Comparison of the three largest particles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
34<\/td>\n | Figure 15 \u2013 Structural levels of a database Figure 16 \u2013 Option A \u2013 Evaluation of the largest particles by length and width <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
35<\/td>\n | Figure 17 \u2013 Option B \u2013 Extension to include the degree of contamination \u2013 SCI Figure 18 \u2013 Option C \u2013 Extension to include a separate data sheet “direct comparison of test series” <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
36<\/td>\n | 5.7.4 Summary Figure 19 \u2013 Option D \u2013 Extension of the database “to include’comparison with customer standards'” <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
37<\/td>\n | 6 State of the art \u2013 Technical cleanliness in the electronics industry 6.1 Process flow (per cluster) 6.1.1 General 6.1.2 Electronics manufacturing cluster Table 2 \u2013 Electronics manufacturing cluster process flow <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | 6.1.3 Passive components cluster (e.g. for inductors and aluminium electrolytic capacitors) Table 3 \u2013 Process flow for inductors <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
39<\/td>\n | 6.1.4 Electromechanical components cluster Table 4 \u2013 Aluminium electrolytic capacitors <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | Table 5 \u2013 Stamped contact production\/plastic production (housing) process flow Table 6 \u2013 Housing assembly process flow <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
41<\/td>\n | 6.1.5 PCB cluster 6.2 Technical cleanliness in the electronics industry \u2013 current situation 6.2.1 General Table 7 \u2013 PCB cluster process flow <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
42<\/td>\n | 6.2.2 Electronics manufacturing Table 8 \u2013 Empirical data from electronics manufacturing cluster <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
43<\/td>\n | 6.2.3 Electronic components Table 9 \u2013 Empirical data from inductors Table 10 \u2013 Empirical data from aluminium electrolytic capacitors <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
44<\/td>\n | Table 11 \u2013 Empirical data from tantalum capacitors Table 12 \u2013 Empirical data from chip components <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
45<\/td>\n | Table 13 \u2013 Empirical data from shunts Table 14 \u2013 Empirical data from quartz <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
46<\/td>\n | 6.2.4 Electromechanical components Table 15 \u2013 Empirical data from semiconductors Table 16 \u2013 Empirical data from metallic components \u2013stamping from pre-treated strip stock <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
47<\/td>\n | Table 17 \u2013 Empirical data from metallic components \u2013 stamping of contact from untreated strip stock and subsequent electroplating process Table 18 \u2013 Empirical data from metallic components \u2013 turning of pins andsubsequent electroplating process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
48<\/td>\n | Table 19 \u2013 Empirical data from pure plastic parts Table 20 \u2013 Empirical data from joined strip connectors <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | Table 21 \u2013 Empirical data from high-voltage connectors (typically shielded) Table 22 \u2013 Empirical data from the assembly process of non-metallic components <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
50<\/td>\n | 6.2.5 Metal housings Table 23 \u2013 Empirical data from die-cast aluminium housing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
51<\/td>\n | 6.2.6 Packaging 6.2.7 Printed circuit boards (PCBs) Figure 20 \u2013 Flexible circuit board Table 24 \u2013 Empirical data from deep-drawn trays (new) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
52<\/td>\n | Figure 21 \u2013 Rigid circuit board Table 25 \u2013 Empirical data from flexible PCBs without cleaning step <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
53<\/td>\n | Table 26 \u2013 Empirical data from bare, flexible PCBs with cleaning step Table 27 \u2013 Empirical data from bare, rigid PCBs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
54<\/td>\n | 6.3 Determining potential particle sources in production areas 6.3.1 General 6.3.2 Particle generation 6.3.3 Electronics manufacturing cluster <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
55<\/td>\n | 6.3.4 Passive components cluster <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
56<\/td>\n | Figure 22 \u2013 Burr formation on copper wire (D = 2,25 mm) after use of wire-cutter Figure 23 \u2013 Particles generated by wire cutting D = 1,8 mm (tinned copper) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
57<\/td>\n | Figure 24 \u2013 Particles generated by wire cutting D = 1,8 mm (tinned copper) Figure 25 \u2013 Particle (tin) adhering to a tinned copper wire D = 2,25 mm <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
58<\/td>\n | Figure 26 \u2013 Hair-like particle (tin whiskers) chipped off a tinned wire (655 \u00b5m long) Figure 27 \u2013 Milled enamel wires <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
59<\/td>\n | Figure 28 \u2013 Molten solder balls fused to plastic housings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
60<\/td>\n | Figure 29 \u2013 Ferrite particle, identified as metallic (419 \u00b5m) Figure 30 \u2013 Ferrite particle, identified as non-metallic (558 \u00b5m) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | 6.3.5 Electromechanical components cluster Figure 31 \u2013 Non-metallic particle, probably burr or plastic residue (217 \u00b5m) Figure 32 \u2013 Non-metallic particle, probably pink polystyrene packaging material <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
62<\/td>\n | Figure 33 \u2013 Shielding plate <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
63<\/td>\n | Figure 34 \u2013 Stamped contacts Figure 35 \u2013 Connector pin <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
64<\/td>\n | Figure 36 \u2013 Connector housing Figure 37 \u2013 58-pin connector housing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
65<\/td>\n | 6.3.6 PCB cluster Figure 38 \u2013 12-pin connector with bridged contacts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
66<\/td>\n | Figure 39 \u2013 Plastic particles + fibres Figure 40 \u2013 Plastic particles Figure 41 \u2013 Metallic particle <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
67<\/td>\n | Figure 42 \u2013 Milling crosses V-scoring line <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
68<\/td>\n | Figure 43 \u2013 V-scoring line on milling edge Figure 44 \u2013 Chip formation in milled hole <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
69<\/td>\n | Figure 45 \u2013 Edge plating Figure 46 \u2013 Connections for electroplated gold areas <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
70<\/td>\n | Figure 47 \u2013 Deep milling Figure 48 \u2013 Chip formation caused by stamping <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
71<\/td>\n | Figure 49 \u2013 Flexible circuit board with undercut Figure 50 \u2013 Punching burr in hole <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
72<\/td>\n | Figure 51 \u2013 Punching burr Figure 52 \u2013 Damaged metallic stiffener <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
73<\/td>\n | Figure 53 \u2013 Stamping residue along stamped edge Figure 54 \u2013 Stamping residue loosened by pickling bath <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
74<\/td>\n | 6.4 Cleanliness-controlled design and process selection 6.4.1 Aspects of cleanliness-controlled design\/production with regard to metallic particles Figure 55 \u2013 Plastic element with burr Figure 56 \u2013 Particles on externally supplied plastic elements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
76<\/td>\n | 6.4.2 Environmental cleanliness and internal production processes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
77<\/td>\n | Figure 57 \u2013 Process chain analysis as per VDA 19 Part 2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
78<\/td>\n | 6.5 Environmental cleanliness analysis and visualisation 6.5.1 General 6.5.2 Procedure for environmental analysis Figure 58 \u2013 Cleanroom production <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
79<\/td>\n | Figure 59 \u2013 Example particle trap Figure 60 \u2013 Position of particle trap <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
80<\/td>\n | Figure 61 \u2013 Database \u2013 Visualisation Figure 62 \u2013 Illustration of the Illig value with max. three particles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
81<\/td>\n | Figure 63 \u2013 Airborne dispersion diagram Figure 64 \u2013 Analysis results in the cleanroom <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
82<\/td>\n | 6.5.3 Conclusions: Figure 65 \u2013 Analysis results in the area not governed by VDA 19 Figure 66 \u2013 Weighting of factors influencing technical cleanliness <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
83<\/td>\n | 6.6 Cleaning tips 6.6.1 General 6.6.2 Washing 6.6.3 Brushing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
84<\/td>\n | 6.6.4 Suction-cleaning Figure 67 \u2013 Manual cleaning with brush and illuminated magnifier Figure 68 \u2013 ESD brush <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
85<\/td>\n | 6.6.5 Blowing 6.6.6 Reducing carry-over and controlling cleanliness in workplace design Figure 69 \u2013 Workstations designed for cleanliness control <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
86<\/td>\n | 6.6.7 Adhesive methods 6.7 Packaging and logistics requirements 7 Why do metallic particles in assemblies so rarely cause short circuits? 7.1 General Figure 70 \u2013 Adhesive roller system for PCB contact cleaning <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
87<\/td>\n | 7.2 Probability of contact 7.2.1 Introduction and theory Figure 71 \u2013 Diagram showing failure risks based on metallic particles on assemblies <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
88<\/td>\n | Figure 72 \u2013 Sketch of electrical arrangement (particle forming “bridge” between two conductors) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
89<\/td>\n | Figure 73 \u2013 Diagram showing contact point of a particle on a conductor \u2013nickel-gold conductor and copper particle <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
90<\/td>\n | 7.2.2 Testing the probability of contact Table 28 \u2013 List of materials used in the test <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
91<\/td>\n | Figure 74 \u2013 SIR test circuit boards (interleaving comb pattern layout) Figure 75 \u2013 Voltage source that measures current with an analogue picoamperemeter <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
92<\/td>\n | 7.2.3 Results Figure 76 \u2013 Automated current measurement with software <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
93<\/td>\n | Figure 77 \u2013 Comparison of CU particles in three conditions on SAC305 PCBs Figure 78 \u2013 Overview of all metals in the voltage classes, rounded <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
94<\/td>\n | 7.3 Rinsing extraction versus actual mobility 7.4 Particle sinks <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
95<\/td>\n | 7.5 Effect of short circuits on ICs 7.6 Tool for estimating the risk of short circuit 7.6.1 Overview <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
96<\/td>\n | 7.6.2 Model hypotheses Figure 79 \u2013 Functional structure of risk assessment tool <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
97<\/td>\n | 7.6.3 Calculation methods 7.6.4 Orientation factor <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
98<\/td>\n | 7.6.5 Critical area Figure 80 \u2013 Geometric constraints at a contact pair <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
99<\/td>\n | 7.6.6 Number of particles per size class Figure 81 \u2013 Clearance areas up to 400 \u00b5m (in white) Figure 82 \u2013 Clearance areas up to 600 \u00b5m (in white) Figure 83 \u2013 Clearance areas up to 1000 \u00b5m (in white) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
100<\/td>\n | 7.6.7 Weighting factors <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
101<\/td>\n | 7.7 Example use of the risk assessment tool 7.7.1 Example use of the risk assessment tool for calculating failure rate Figure 84 \u2013 Example calculation 1 \u2013 Calculating an absolute probability of failure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
102<\/td>\n | 7.7.2 Example use of the risk assessment tool for design changes Figure 85 \u2013 Example calculation 2 \u2013 Calculating probabilities of failurefor layout changes e.g. for a new generation component <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
103<\/td>\n | 7.7.3 Example use of the risk assessment tool for specification violations Figure 86 \u2013 Example calculation 3 \u2013 Optimising the main variables Figure 87 \u2013 Example calculation 3 \u2013 Calculating the changed probabilityof failure in the event of specification violation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
104<\/td>\n | 8 Summary 9 Outlook <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
105<\/td>\n | 10 Related topics 10.1 Filmic contamination 10.1.1 General 10.1.2 Biological films 10.1.3 Chemical films 10.2 Whiskers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
106<\/td>\n | Figure 88 \u2013 Whiskers growth of > 8 mm over a period of 10 years <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
107<\/td>\n | Figure 89 \u2013 Whiskers growth of > 2 mm over a period of 6 months <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
108<\/td>\n | Annex A (informative)Determining the surface area of componentsand assembled circuit boards Figure A.1 \u2013 Dimensions of cuboid components <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
109<\/td>\n | Figure A.2 \u2013 Dimensions of cylindrical components <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
110<\/td>\n | Table A.1 \u2013 Sample values of standard components to determinethe component surface area <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
111<\/td>\n | Annex B (informative)Examples of cleanliness clarification forms Figure B.1 \u2013 Ambient cleanliness clarification form <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
112<\/td>\n | Figure B.2 \u2013 Ambient cleanliness clarification form <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
113<\/td>\n | Figure B.3 \u2013 Component cleanliness clarification form <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
114<\/td>\n | Figure B.4 \u2013 Component cleanliness clarification form <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
115<\/td>\n | Figure B.5 \u2013 Component cleanliness clarification form <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
116<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Printed board assemblies – Technical cleanliness of components and printed board assemblies<\/b><\/p>\n |