{"id":79066,"date":"2024-10-17T18:28:36","date_gmt":"2024-10-17T18:28:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/asce-9780784409213-2007\/"},"modified":"2024-10-24T19:38:58","modified_gmt":"2024-10-24T19:38:58","slug":"asce-9780784409213-2007","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/asce\/asce-9780784409213-2007\/","title":{"rendered":"ASCE 9780784409213 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Thomas and Ellis discuss the most troublesome contract clauses and present rules to construe them so as to avoid disputes that must be resolved in court.<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6<\/td>\n | Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | Preface <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | Acknowledgments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | Chapter 1. Introduction Objective Scope <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
22<\/td>\n | How to Use This Book <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | Outline <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | Chapter 2. Basic Concepts The Appellate Process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | Fact-Sensitive <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | Hierarchy of Documents and Rules Consistency Equity <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
28<\/td>\n | Reference <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | Chapter 3. What Is a Contract? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | Formation Principles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
33<\/td>\n | Form <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
34<\/td>\n | Exercise 3-1: Rosen & Morelli and Kreisler Borg <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
35<\/td>\n | References Additional Cases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
36<\/td>\n | Chapter 4. Fundamental Principles Common-Law Rules Procedural Interpretation Rules <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
45<\/td>\n | Operational Interpretation Rules <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
54<\/td>\n | References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
56<\/td>\n | Chapter 5. Types of Changes and Disputes Identifying the Type of Dispute <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
57<\/td>\n | Bilateral Change vs. Unilateral Change <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
58<\/td>\n | Cardinal Changes Minor Changes Change Orders <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
60<\/td>\n | Constructive Changes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | Examples Exercise 5-1: Diamond and the U.S. Assay Office <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
64<\/td>\n | Exercise 5-2: Grand Forks and Moorhead Construction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
67<\/td>\n | Reference <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
68<\/td>\n | Chapter 6. Notice Requirements Contract Language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
69<\/td>\n | Background <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
72<\/td>\n | Rules of Application <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
82<\/td>\n | Other Issues <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
86<\/td>\n | Illustrative Example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
89<\/td>\n | Exercise 6-1: Granger Contracting and Chiappisi Brothers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
91<\/td>\n | Exercise 6-2: Linneman Construction and Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
93<\/td>\n | Exercise 6-3: Acchione & Canuso and PennDOT <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
94<\/td>\n | Exercise 6-4: McKeny Construction and Rowlesburg, W.V. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
95<\/td>\n | Exercise 6-5: Northern Improvement Co. and South Dakota State Highway Commission <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
97<\/td>\n | Exercise 6-6: Federico Co. and Commonwealth of Massachusetts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
98<\/td>\n | References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
99<\/td>\n | Additional Cases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
100<\/td>\n | Chapter 7.Extra Work and Oral Change Orders Contract Language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
101<\/td>\n | Background <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
103<\/td>\n | Rules of Application <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
115<\/td>\n | Other Issues <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
116<\/td>\n | Illustrative Example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
120<\/td>\n | Exercise 7-1: Long and Lazer Construction Co. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
121<\/td>\n | Exercise 7-2: Henry\u2019s Electric Co. and Marilyn Apartments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
122<\/td>\n | Exercise 7-3: Laramee and Care Systems Exercise 7-4: Owens Plumbing & Heating and Bartlett, Kans. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
123<\/td>\n | Exercise 7-5: Utah DOT and Thorn Construction Co. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
124<\/td>\n | Exercise 7-6: Security Painting Co. and PennDOT <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
125<\/td>\n | References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
126<\/td>\n | Additional Cases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
127<\/td>\n | Chapter 8. Rules for Contract Interpretation Contract Language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
128<\/td>\n | Rules of Application <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
145<\/td>\n | Rule against the Drafter <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
146<\/td>\n | The Order-of-Precedence Clause <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
147<\/td>\n | Illustrative Example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
151<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-1: Barash and New York <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
152<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-2: Long and Lazer Construction Co. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
153<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-3: W. H. Armstrong & Co. and U.S. Government <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
154<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-4: R. B. Wright Construction Co. and U.S. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
156<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-5: Lyon Metal Products and Kaiser Construction Co. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
158<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-6: Lancaster Area Sewer Authority and Environmental Utilities Corp. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
161<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-7: Metro Insulation Corp. and Boston Housing Authority <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
163<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-8: Foothill Junior College District and Jasper Construction Co. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
164<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-9: Western Contracting Corp. and Georgia State Highway Department <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
165<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-10: Jacksonville State University, Dawson Construction Co., and Bob Roberts Co. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
167<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-11: Security Painting Co. and PennDOT <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
169<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-12: D\u2019Annunzio Brothers and NJT <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
170<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-13: Blake Construction Co. and U.S. Navy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
172<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-14: Farrell-Cheek Steel Co. and Forest Construction Co. Exercise 8-15: Granger Contracting Co. and Chiappisi Brothers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
174<\/td>\n | Exercise 8-16: J. A. Jones Construction Co. and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
178<\/td>\n | References Additional Cases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
179<\/td>\n | Chapter 9. Differing Site Conditions Contract Language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
180<\/td>\n | Background <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
182<\/td>\n | Rules of Application <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
193<\/td>\n | Type II Condition <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
195<\/td>\n | Other Issues <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
196<\/td>\n | Illustrative Example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
198<\/td>\n | Exercise 9-1: Blauner Construction Co. and U.S. Treasury <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
200<\/td>\n | Exercise 9-2: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Stuyvesant Dredging Co. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
203<\/td>\n | Exercise 9-3: Morrison & Lamping and State of Oregon <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
206<\/td>\n | Exercise 9-4: Umpqua River Navigation Co. and Western Pacific Dredging Corp. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
209<\/td>\n | Exercise 9-5: Grand Forks, N.D., and Moorhead Construction Co. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
212<\/td>\n | Exercise 9-6: Western Contracting Corp. and California Department of Water Resources <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
213<\/td>\n | Exercise 9-7: P. J. Maffei Building & Wrecking Corp. and U.S. Government <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
214<\/td>\n | Exercise 9-8: Carlos Teodori and Penn Hills School District Authority <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
216<\/td>\n | References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
218<\/td>\n | Additional Cases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
219<\/td>\n | Chapter 10. Misrepresentations Contract Language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
220<\/td>\n | Background <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
221<\/td>\n | Rules of Application <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
237<\/td>\n | Relevant Information Withheld <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
241<\/td>\n | Illustrative Example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
244<\/td>\n | Other Issues <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
246<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-1: J. A. Thompson & Son and State of Hawaii <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
247<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-2: Williams-McWilliams Co., Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Co., and U.S. Government <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
251<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-3: P. T. & L. Construction Co. and State of New Jersey <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
254<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-4: Charlotte, N.C., and Ruby-Collins <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
257<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-5: Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and York Engineering & Construction Co. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
259<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-6: Utah DOT and Thorn Construction Co. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
260<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-7: Indianapolis and Twin Lakes Enterprises <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
261<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-8: Post & Front Properties and Roanoke Construction Co. Exercise 10-9: Ideker Corp. and Missouri State Highway Commission <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
263<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-10: Waldinger Corp. and Daniel Hamm Drayage Co. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
265<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-11: Pinkerton & Laws Co. and Roadway Express <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
269<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-12: Flippin Materials Co. and U.S. Government <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
271<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-13: Public Constructors and State of New York Department of Public Works <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
272<\/td>\n | Exercise 10-14: E. H. Morrill Co. and California Department of Public Works <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
274<\/td>\n | References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
275<\/td>\n | Additional Case <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
276<\/td>\n | Chapter 11. Defective Specifications Contract Language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
277<\/td>\n | Background <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
278<\/td>\n | Rules of Application <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
290<\/td>\n | Performance Specifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
295<\/td>\n | Illustrative Example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
297<\/td>\n | Exercise 11-1: Blount Brothers and U.S. Government <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
298<\/td>\n | Exercise 11-2: Marine Colloids and M. D. Hardy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
300<\/td>\n | Exercise 11-3: Western Foundation Corp. and Veterans Administration <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
302<\/td>\n | Exercise 11-4: J. D. Hedin Construction Co. and Veterans Administration 1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
305<\/td>\n | Exercise 11-5: J. D. Hedin Construction Co. and Veterans Administration 2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
308<\/td>\n | Exercise 11-6: Weston Racquet Club and Republic Floors of New England <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
310<\/td>\n | Exercise 11-7: Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals and Newman Glass Works <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
311<\/td>\n | Exercise 11-8: ALTL and The Architectural Group <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
312<\/td>\n | References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
314<\/td>\n | Additional Cases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
315<\/td>\n | Chapter 12. The No-Damages-for-Delay Clause Contract Language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
317<\/td>\n | Judicial Attitude Rules of Application <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
327<\/td>\n | Illustrative Examples <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
330<\/td>\n | References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
331<\/td>\n | Additional Cases <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
332<\/td>\n | Chapter 13. Substantial Completion Contract Language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
333<\/td>\n | Background Significance of Substantial Completion <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
336<\/td>\n | Evolution of Substantial Completion <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
337<\/td>\n | Primary Rules of Inquiry <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
343<\/td>\n | Certificate of Substantial Completion <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
344<\/td>\n | Illustrative Examples <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
346<\/td>\n | References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
347<\/td>\n | Additional Case <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
348<\/td>\n | Chapter 14. Liquidated Damages Contract Language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
349<\/td>\n | Background <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
350<\/td>\n | Basic Principles of the Liquidated-Damages Clause <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
353<\/td>\n | Primary Rules of Application <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
356<\/td>\n | Strategy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
357<\/td>\n | Illustrative Examples <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
360<\/td>\n | Exercise 14-1: S. J. Otinger Construction Co. and Montgomery, Ala., Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Board <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
361<\/td>\n | References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
362<\/td>\n | Appendix A: Additional Exercises Exercise 1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
364<\/td>\n | Exercise 2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
366<\/td>\n | Exercise 3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
371<\/td>\n | Exercise 4 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
373<\/td>\n | Exercise 5 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
378<\/td>\n | Exercise 6 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
381<\/td>\n | Exercise 7 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
387<\/td>\n | Appendix B: Exercise Solutions Solution: Exercise 3-1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
388<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 6-1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
389<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 6-2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
391<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 6-3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
392<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 6-4 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
393<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercixe 6-5 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
394<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 6-6 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
395<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 7-1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
396<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 7-2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
397<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 7-3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
399<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 7-4 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
400<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 7-5 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
401<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 7-6 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
402<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
403<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
404<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
406<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-4 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
407<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-5 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
408<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-6 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
409<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-7 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
410<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-8 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
411<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-9 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
413<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-10 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
414<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-11 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
415<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-12 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
416<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-13 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
417<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-14 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
418<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-15 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
419<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 8-16 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
420<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 9-1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
421<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 9-2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
422<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 9-3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
423<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 9-4 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
424<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 9-5 Solution: Exercise 9-6 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
425<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 9-7 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
426<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 9-8 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
427<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
428<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
430<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
431<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-4 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
432<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-5 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
433<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-6 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
434<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-7 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
435<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-8 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
436<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-9 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
437<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-10 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
438<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-11 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
439<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-12 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
440<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-13 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
441<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 10-14 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
442<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 11-1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
443<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 11-2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
444<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 11-3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
446<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 11-4 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
447<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 11-5 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
448<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 11-6 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
449<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 11-7 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
450<\/td>\n | Solution: Exercise 11-8 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
452<\/td>\n | Case Table <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
460<\/td>\n | Index A B C <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
462<\/td>\n | D <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
463<\/td>\n | E F G H <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
464<\/td>\n | I J <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
465<\/td>\n | K L M <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
466<\/td>\n | N O <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
467<\/td>\n | P R S <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
468<\/td>\n | T U V W <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
469<\/td>\n | Y <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
470<\/td>\n | About the Authors <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Interpreting Construction Contracts<\/b><\/p>\n |