Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

EIA TEB25-1985

$28.60

Survey of Data-Display CRT Resolution Measurement Techniques

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
ECIA 1985 30
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Category:

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

Introduction

Information density in displays in increasing rapidly with the
phenomenal growth of data and graphics displays. The introduction
of color to data and avionics displays has required improvement of
the shadow-mask CRT, which heretofore had only limited resolution
demands place on it, mostly for television use. The color
shadow-mask CRT requires special considerations when measuring
resolution to avoid anomalies caused by the physical structure of
the screen. All of this has renewed interest in display resolution
and resolution measurement.

The resolution of date displays and data-display cathode-ray
tubes is a most difficult parameter to characterize accurately.
Large difference in resolution measurements are often observed, due
to the diversity of display formats, such as raster scan and stroke
writing, alphanumerics and graphics. The large diversity of
measurement techniques also produces differing results. Differences
in test operator perception and skills and to the problem.
Resolution data should therefore be used with caution. Figure 1
shows some of the major sources of resolution measurement
error.

When comparing displays or CRTs, the display engineer must be
sure that resolution data are comparable. A display form
manufacturer A specified as having 20-mil resolution at the
half-amplitude points with 200-microampere beam current may
actually have better resolution than a display from manufacturer B
specified as having 10-mil spot size measured with the
shrinking-raster technique at 100 microamperes. It's the age-old
"apples-and-oranges" problem again.

The resolution of CRT display may be expressed in any of several
ways, including:

• spot size

• line width

• number of TV lines

• modulation depth at a specified spatial frequency

• MTF curve

Each of these measurements has differing connotations ad is not
usually directly comparable to the others, especially if drive or
duty-cycle differences are considered.

Resolution may be measured in an even greater number of ways, as
shown in Figure 2. It is the purpose of this paper to present
information on as many techniques as possible.

EIA TEB25-1985
$28.60