{"id":417307,"date":"2024-10-20T06:15:21","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T06:15:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bsi-pd-cen-tr-165132014-2\/"},"modified":"2024-10-26T11:38:36","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T11:38:36","slug":"bsi-pd-cen-tr-165132014-2","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bsi-pd-cen-tr-165132014-2\/","title":{"rendered":"BSI PD CEN\/TR 16513:2014"},"content":{"rendered":"
CEN\/TC 256\/SC 1\/WG 28 “Railway applications\/Infrastructure\/Track geometry quality” conducted a survey of the geometric quality of track across European railway networks. This was to get an understanding and overview of the track geometry across Europe in order to support the definition of track geometric quality classes for the writing of EN 13848-6.<\/p>\n
This Technical Report describes the methodology used for the survey and gives the results.<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4<\/td>\n | Contents Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
5<\/td>\n | Foreword <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
6<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Terms and definitions 3 Symbols and abbreviations Table 1 \u2014 Symbols and abbreviations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | 4 Methodology 4.1 General considerations and confidentiality 4.2 Collected data 4.2.1 Scope of survey 4.2.2 Speed classes applied <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
8<\/td>\n | 4.2.3 Calculation of standard deviation 4.2.4 Calculation of cumulative frequency distributions 4.3 Data processing 5 Participating networks and involvement 5.1 Participating networks <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | 5.2 Sample size of track data Table 2 \u2014 Sample size of track data for each speed class 6 Results 6.1 Results for standard deviation of longitudinal level <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | Figure 1 \u2014 ETQS results for longitudinal level SDLL <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
11<\/td>\n | Figure 2 \u2014 Spread of 90 % percentile for longitudinal level SDLL 6.2 Results for standard deviation of alignment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | Figure 3 \u2014 ETQS results for alignment SDAL <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | Figure 4 \u2014 Spread of 90 % percentile for alignment SDAL 6.3 Observation on results <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | Table 3 \u2014 Track length for QN levels 7 Application of the results to EN 13848-6 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | Annex A (informative) Tables for cumulative frequency distributions for average track quality of all participating networks Table A.1 \u2014 ETQs results for longitudinal level SDLL and alignment SDAL <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | Table A.1 (continuous) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | Annex B (informative) Spread of data collected Figure B.1 \u2014 Spread of 50 % percentile for longitudinal level SDLL <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | Figure B.2 \u2014 Spread of 50 % percentile for alignment level SDAL <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Railway applications. Track. Survey of track geometry quality<\/b><\/p>\n |