{"id":346923,"date":"2024-10-20T00:23:32","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T00:23:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bsi-14-30288700-dc\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T23:51:57","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T23:51:57","slug":"bsi-14-30288700-dc","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bsi-14-30288700-dc\/","title":{"rendered":"BSI 14\/30288700 DC"},"content":{"rendered":"
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5<\/td>\n | CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
6<\/td>\n | Foreword <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | Introduction 0.1 RM-ODP 0.2 UML <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
8<\/td>\n | 0.3 Overview and motivation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 2.1 Identical Recommendations | International Standards 2.2 Additional References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | 3 Definitions 3.1 Definitions from ODP standards 3.1.1 Modelling concept definitions 3.1.2 Viewpoint language definitions 3.2 Definitions from the Enterprise Language 3.3 Definitions from the Unified Modeling Language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
11<\/td>\n | 4 Abbreviations 5 Conventions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | 6 Overview of modelling and system specification approach 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Overview of ODP concepts (extracted from RM-ODP Part 1) 6.2.1 Object Modelling <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | 6.2.2 Viewpoint specifications Figure 1 \u2013 RM-ODP viewpoints <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | 6.2.3 Distribution transparency 6.2.4 Conformance 6.2.5 Enterprise language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | 6.2.6 Information language 6.2.7 Computational language 6.2.8 Engineering language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | 6.2.9 Technology language 6.3 Overview of UML concepts 6.3.1 Structural models <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | 6.3.2 Behavioural models 6.3.3 Model management 6.3.4 Extension mechanisms <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | 6.4 Universes of discourse, ODP specifications and UML models Figure 2 \u2013 Relationships between UOD, ODP specifications, and UML models <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | 6.5 Modelling concepts and UML profiles for ODP viewpoint languages and correspondences 6.6 General principles for expressing and structuring ODP system specifications using UML 6.7 Correspondences between viewpoint specifications 6.7.1 ODP Correspondences <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | 6.7.2 Expressing ODP correspondences in UML 7 Enterprise specification 7.1 Modelling concepts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | 7.1.1 System concepts 7.1.2 Community concepts 7.1.3 Behaviour concepts 7.1.4 Deontic concepts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
22<\/td>\n | 7.1.5 Policy concepts 7.1.6 Accountability concepts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | 7.1.7 Structure of an enterprise specification 7.1.8 Summary of the enterprise language metamodel Figure 3 \u2013 System concepts. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | Figure 4 \u2013 Community concepts. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
25<\/td>\n | Figure 5 \u2013 Behaviour concepts. Figure 6 \u2013 Policy concepts. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | Figure 7 \u2013 Deontic and accountability concepts. Figure 8 \u2013 Deontic token lifecycle. 7.2 UML profile <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | 7.2.1 ODP system 7.2.2 Scope 7.2.3 Field of application 7.2.4 Community 7.2.5 Enterprise object 7.2.6 Object types and templates as enterprise objects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
28<\/td>\n | Figure 9 \u2013 An explicit representation of the type of an enterprise object so that the object can access its type. 7.2.7 Community object 7.2.8 Objective 7.2.9 Contract 7.2.10 Behaviour 7.2.10.1 General 7.2.10.2 Behaviour as processes and steps <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | 7.2.10.3 Behaviour as interactions between roles 7.2.10.4 Interface role 7.2.10.5 Violation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | 7.2.11 Action Roles 7.2.11.1 Actor (with respect to an action) 7.2.11.2 Artefact (with respect to an action) 7.2.11.3 Resource (with respect to an action) 7.2.12 Deontic concepts 7.2.12.1 Burden 7.2.12.2 Permit 7.2.12.3 Embargo <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
31<\/td>\n | 7.2.13 Policy Figure 10 \u2013 Pattern for UML expression of a policy. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
32<\/td>\n | 7.2.14 Accountability concepts 7.2.14.1 Party 7.2.14.2 Accountable action 7.2.14.3 Authorization 7.2.14.4 Delegation 7.2.14.5 Principal 7.2.14.6 Agent 7.2.14.7 Prescription 7.2.14.8 Commitment 7.2.14.9 Declaration 7.2.14.10 Evaluation 7.2.15 Summary of UML extensions for the enterprise language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
33<\/td>\n | Figure 11 \u2013 Model management. Figure 12 \u2013 Classifiers. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
34<\/td>\n | Figure 13 \u2013 Activities. Figure 14 \u2013 Constraints. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
35<\/td>\n | Figure 15 \u2013 Relationships. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
36<\/td>\n | 7.3 Enterprise specification structure (in UML terms) 7.4 Viewpoint correspondences for the enterprise language 7.4.1 Contents of this clause 7.4.2 Enterprise and information viewpoint specification correspondences 7.4.3 Enterprise and computational viewpoint specification correspondences <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
37<\/td>\n | 7.4.4 Enterprise and engineering viewpoint specification correspondences 7.4.5 Enterprise and technology viewpoint specification correspondences 8 Information specification 8.1 Modelling concepts 8.1.1 Information object <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | 8.1.2 Information object type 8.1.3 Information object class 8.1.4 Information object template 8.1.5 Information action and action types 8.1.6 Invariant schema 8.1.7 Static schema 8.1.8 Dynamic schema 8.1.9 Structure of an information specification <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
39<\/td>\n | 8.1.10 Summary of the information language metamodel Figure 16 \u2013 Information language concepts. 8.2 UML profile 8.2.1 Information object 8.2.2 Object types and templates as information objects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | Figure 17 \u2013 An explicit representation of the type of an information object so that the object can access its type. 8.2.3 Information action and action types 8.2.4 Relationships between information objects and between information object types 8.2.5 Invariant schema <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
41<\/td>\n | 8.2.6 Static schema 8.2.7 Dynamic schema 8.2.8 Summary of the UML extensions for the information language Figure 18 \u2013 Graphical representation of the information language profile. 8.3 Information specification structure (in UML terms) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
42<\/td>\n | 8.4 Viewpoint correspondences for the information language 8.4.1 Contents of this clause 8.4.2 Enterprise and information viewpoint specification correspondences 8.4.3 Information and computational viewpoint specification correspondences <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
43<\/td>\n | 8.4.4 Information and technology viewpoint specification correspondences 9 Computational specification 9.1 Modelling concepts 9.1.1 Computational object 9.1.2 Interface [Part 2 \u2013 8.4] 9.1.3 Interaction [Part 2 \u2013 8.3] 9.1.4 Environment contract [Part 2 \u2013 11.2.3] <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
44<\/td>\n | 9.1.5 Behaviour (of an object) [Part 2 \u2013 8.6] 9.1.6 Signal [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.1] 9.1.7 Operation [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.3] 9.1.8 Announcement [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.3] 9.1.9 Interrogation [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.4] 9.1.10 Flow [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.5] 9.1.11 Signal interface [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.6] 9.1.12 Operation interface [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.7] 9.1.13 Stream interface [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.4] <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
45<\/td>\n | 9.1.14 Computational object template [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.9] 9.1.15 Computational interface template [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.9] 9.1.16 Signal interface signature [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.11] 9.1.17 Operation interface signature [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.12] 9.1.18 Stream interface signature [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.13] 9.1.19 Binding object [Part 3 \u2013 7.1.14] 9.1.20 Binding [Part 2 \u2013 13.4, Part 3 \u2013 7. 2.3] 9.1.21 Transparency schema [Part 3 \u2013 16] <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
46<\/td>\n | 9.1.22 Structure of a computational specification 9.1.23 Summary of the concepts of the computational metamodel <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
47<\/td>\n | Figure 19 \u2013 Computational language concepts. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
48<\/td>\n | 9.2 UML profile 9.2.1 Computational object <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | 9.2.2 Object types and templates as computational objects Figure 20 \u2013 An explicit representation of the type of a computational object so that the object can access its type. 9.2.3 Binding object 9.2.4 Environment contract 9.2.5 Signal 9.2.6 Announcement 9.2.7 Invocation 9.2.8 Termination <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
50<\/td>\n | 9.2.9 Computational interface 9.2.10 Computational interface signature 9.2.11 Computational signature 9.2.12 Signal signature 9.2.13 Announcement signature 9.2.14 Invocation signature 9.2.15 Termination signature 9.2.16 Interrogation signature <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
51<\/td>\n | 9.2.17 Bindings Figure 21 \u2013 Two operation interface signatures. Figure 22 \u2013 An explicit primitive binding between two interfaces. Figure 23 \u2013 An explicit primitive binding between two interfaces showing their interface signatures. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
52<\/td>\n | Figure 24 \u2013 An implicit primitive binding between two interfaces. 9.2.18 Flow Figure 25 \u2013 An example of the specification of flows. 9.2.19 Transparency schema <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
53<\/td>\n | 9.2.20 Summary of the UML extensions for the computational language Figure 26 \u2013 Graphical representation of the computational language profile (using the UML notation). 9.3 Computational specification structure (in UML terms) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
54<\/td>\n | 9.4 Viewpoint correspondences for the computational language 9.4.1 Contents of this clause 9.4.2 Enterprise and computational viewpoint specification correspondences 9.4.3 Information and computational viewpoint specification correspondences 9.4.4 Computational and engineering viewpoint specification correspondences <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
55<\/td>\n | 10 Engineering specification 10.1 Modelling concepts 10.1.1 Basic concepts 10.1.1.1 Basic engineering object <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
56<\/td>\n | 10.1.1.2 Cluster 10.1.1.3 Cluster manager 10.1.1.4 Capsule 10.1.1.5 Capsule manager 10.1.1.6 Nucleus 10.1.1.7 Node 10.1.1.8 Engineering interfaces and signatures 10.1.2 Channel concepts 10.1.2.1 Channel 10.1.2.2 Stub 10.1.2.3 Binder 10.1.2.4 Interceptor 10.1.2.5 Protocol object 10.1.2.6 Communication domain <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
57<\/td>\n | 10.1.2.7 Communication interface 10.1.3 Identifier concepts 10.1.3.1 Binding endpoint identifier 10.1.3.2 Engineering interface reference 10.1.3.3 Engineering interface reference management domain 10.1.3.4 Engineering interface reference management policy 10.1.3.5 Cluster template 10.1.4 Checkpointing concepts 10.1.4.1 Checkpoint 10.1.4.2 Checkpointing 10.1.4.3 Cluster checkpoint 10.1.4.4 Deactivation 10.1.4.5 Cloning 10.1.4.6 Recovery 10.1.4.7 Reactivation 10.1.4.8 Migration 10.1.5 ODP functions in the context of the engineering viewpoint specifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
58<\/td>\n | 10.1.6 Summary of the engineering language metamodel 10.1.6.1 Engineering Objects Figure 27 \u2013 Engineering objects. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
59<\/td>\n | Figure 28 \u2013 Engineering interfaces. 10.1.6.2 Node structure Figure 29 \u2013 Engineering language \u2013 basic concepts. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
60<\/td>\n | 10.1.6.3 Channels Figure 30 \u2013 Engineering language model \u2013 channels. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | 10.1.6.4 Domains Figure 31 \u2013 Domains. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
62<\/td>\n | 10.1.6.5 Identifiers Figure 32 \u2013 Engineering language model \u2013 identifiers. 10.1.6.6 Checkpoints Figure 33 \u2013 Engineering language model \u2013 checkpoints. 10.1.6.7 ODP functions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
63<\/td>\n | Figure 34 \u2013 Engineering language model \u2013 ODP functions. 10.2 UML profile 10.2.1 Engineering object templates and types <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
64<\/td>\n | 10.2.2 Object types and templates as engineering objects Figure 35 \u2013 An explicit representation of the type of an engineering object so that the object can access its type. 10.2.3 Cluster 10.2.4 Cluster manager 10.2.5 Capsule <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
65<\/td>\n | 10.2.6 Capsule manager 10.2.7 Nucleus 10.2.8 Node 10.2.9 Channel 10.2.10 Stub 10.2.11 Binder 10.2.12 Interceptor 10.2.13 Protocol object 10.2.14 Communication domain 10.2.15 Engineering Interfaces 10.2.15.1 Communication interface 10.2.15.2 Operation interface 10.2.15.3 Stream interface 10.2.15.4 Signal interface 10.2.15.5 Engineering interface signature <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
66<\/td>\n | 10.2.16 Binding endpoint identifier 10.2.17 Engineering interface reference 10.2.18 Engineering interface reference management domain 10.2.19 Engineering interface reference management policy 10.2.20 Checkpoint 10.2.21 Checkpointing 10.2.22 Cluster checkpoint 10.2.23 Deactivation 10.2.24 Cloning 10.2.25 Recovery 10.2.26 Reactivation 10.2.27 Migration 10.2.28 ODP functions 10.2.29 Summary of the UML extensions for the engineering language <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
67<\/td>\n | Figure 36 \u2013 Graphical representation of the engineering language profile (using the UML notation). <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
68<\/td>\n | 10.3 Engineering specification structure (in UML terms) 10.4 Viewpoint correspondences for the engineering language 10.4.1 Contents of this clause 10.4.2 Engineering and computational viewpoint specification correspondences 10.4.3 Engineering and technology viewpoint specification correspondences <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
69<\/td>\n | 11 Technology specification 11.1 Modelling concepts 11.1.1 Implementable standard 11.1.2 Implementation 11.1.3 IXIT 11.1.4 Summary of the technology language metamodel Figure 37 \u2013 Model of the technology language. 11.2 UML profile 11.2.1 Technology object 11.2.2 Object types and templates as technology objects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
70<\/td>\n | 11.2.3 Implementable standard 11.2.4 Implementation 11.2.5 IXIT 11.2.6 Summary of the UML extensions for the technology language Figure 38 \u2013 Graphical representation of the technology language profile (using the UML notation). 11.3 Technology specification structure (in UML terms) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
71<\/td>\n | 11.4 Viewpoint correspondences for the technology language 12 Correspondences specification 12.1 Modelling concepts 12.1.1 Correspondence specification 12.1.2 Correspondence rule <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
72<\/td>\n | 12.1.3 Correspondence link 12.1.4 Correspondence endpoint 12.1.5 Term 12.1.6 Summary of the Correspondences metamodel Figure 39 \u2013 Correspondences specification concepts. 12.2 UML profile 12.2.1 Correspondence specification 12.2.2 Correspondence rule 12.2.3 Correspondence link <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
73<\/td>\n | 12.2.4 Correspondence endpoint 12.2.5 Summary of the UML extensions for correspondences specification Figure 40 \u2013 Graphical representation of the UML profile for correspondences specifications. 13 Modelling conformance in ODP system specifications 13.1 Modelling conformance concepts 13.2 UML profile <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
74<\/td>\n | Figure 41 \u2013 UML profile for conformance. 14 Conformance and compliance to this document 14.1 Conformance 14.2 Compliance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
75<\/td>\n | Annex A An example of ODP specifications using UML A.1 The Templeman Library System A.1.1 Introduction A.1.2 Rules of operation of the Library <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
76<\/td>\n | A.1.3 Expressing the Library System Specification in UML Figure A.1 \u2013 UML specification of the ODP system. A.2 Enterprise specification in UML A.2.1 Basic enterprise concepts Table A.1 \u2013 Enterprise language icons. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
78<\/td>\n | A.2.2 Communities Figure A.2 \u2013 UML Enterprise specification of the Library system. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
79<\/td>\n | Figure A.3 \u2013 UML specification of the Library community. A.2.3 Processes Figure A.4 \u2013 Processes. A.2.3.1 Borrow item process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
80<\/td>\n | Figure A.5 \u2013 Borrow item process. A.2.3.2 Add member process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
81<\/td>\n | Figure A.6 \u2013 Add member process. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
82<\/td>\n | Figure A.7 \u2013 Validate member subprocess. A.2.4 Roles Figure A.8 \u2013 Library community roles. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
83<\/td>\n | Figure A.9 \u2013 Behaviour of the Library system role. A.2.5 Interactions Figure A.10 \u2013 Process loan interaction. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
84<\/td>\n | Figure A.11 \u2013 State diagram for Library system role in the interaction Process loan. A.2.6 Enterprise Objects A.2.6.1 Actors Figure A.12 \u2013 Actor role fulfilment and assignment rules. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
85<\/td>\n | A.2.6.2 Artefacts Figure A.13 \u2013 Loan as an artefact. A.2.6.3 Summary of enterprise objects Figure A.14 \u2013 Enterprise objects. A.2.6.4 Enterprise object states <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
86<\/td>\n | Figure A.15 \u2013 States of the loan enterprise object. Figure A.16 \u2013 States of the Library member enterprise object. A.2.7 Policies A.2.7.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
87<\/td>\n | A.2.7.2 Expressing ODP policies in UML A.2.7.3 Expressing Loan policies in the Templeman Library Figure A.17 \u2013 Structure of the Policies package. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
88<\/td>\n | Figure A.18 \u2013 Examples of policy expressions: Lending limit policy. Figure A.19 \u2013 Examples of policy expressions: Loan duration policy. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
89<\/td>\n | A.2.8 Accountability Figure A.20 \u2013 Example of delegation. A.3 Information specification in UML A.3.1 Overview Table A.2 \u2013 Information language icons. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
90<\/td>\n | Figure A.21 \u2013 Structure of the information viewpoint specification of the Library system (excerpt). A.3.2 Basic elements Figure A.22 \u2013 Object types of the information viewpoint specification of the Library system. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
91<\/td>\n | Figure A.23 \u2013 Action types of the information viewpoint specification of the Library system. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
92<\/td>\n | A.3.3 Invariant Schemata <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
93<\/td>\n | A.3.4 Static Schemata Figure A.24 \u2013 Static schema with the initial state of the Library system. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
94<\/td>\n | Figure A.25 \u2013 Static schema with the configuration of the Library system at day 95. A.3.5 Dynamic Schemata: Description of the system behaviour <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
95<\/td>\n | Figure A.26 \u2013 StateMachine of the Loan information object. Figure A.27 \u2013 StateMachine of a Borrower information object. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
96<\/td>\n | Figure A.28 \u2013 StateMachine of an Item information object. A.3.6 Correspondences between the Enterprise and the Information specifications Figure A.29 \u2013 Example of correspondence between the enterprise and information specifications. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
97<\/td>\n | A.4 Computational specification in UML A.4.1 Overview A.4.2 Computational objects and interfaces Figure A.30 \u2013 Basic structure of the computational viewpoint specification of the Library system. Table A.3 \u2013 Computational language icons. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
98<\/td>\n | Figure A.31 \u2013 Component diagram with computational object templates and interface signatures of the system. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
99<\/td>\n | Figure A.32 \u2013 Interaction signatures. Figure A.33 \u2013 Internal structure of the LibrarySystemMainFunctionality computational object. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
100<\/td>\n | Figure A.34 \u2013 Data types handled by the computational objects. A.4.3 Behaviour <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
101<\/td>\n | Figure A.35 \u2013 Interaction diagram for the borrowing process. A.4.4 Correspondences between the Enterprise and Computational specifications Figure A.36 \u2013 Example of correspondence between the enterprise and computational specifications. A.4.5 Correspondences between the Information and Computational specifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
102<\/td>\n | Figure A.37 \u2013 Example of correspondence between the information and computational specifications. A.5 Engineering specification in UML A.5.1 Overview Table A.4 \u2013 Engineering language icons. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
103<\/td>\n | A.5.2 Computational Objects A.5.3 Node configuration Figure A.38 \u2013 Node configuration overview. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
104<\/td>\n | A.5.4 Node structures Figure A.39 \u2013 Example of BEO configuration. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
105<\/td>\n | Figure A.40 \u2013 Example EnterpriseServer internals. A.5.5 Channels <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
106<\/td>\n | Figure A.41 \u2013 Internals of a channel. A.5.6 Communication Domain Figure A.42 \u2013 Example of a communication domain. A.5.7 Representing Functions Figure A.43 \u2013 Checkpointing process. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
107<\/td>\n | Figure A.44 \u2013 Deactivation process. Figure A.45 \u2013 Cloning process. Figure A.46 \u2013 Reactivation process. Figure A.47 \u2013 Recovery process. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
108<\/td>\n | Figure A.48 \u2013 Migration process. Figure A.49 \u2013 Use of functions. A.5.8 Channel creation and interface location Figure A.50 \u2013 Channel creation interface. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
109<\/td>\n | A.5.9 Interface reference management domain Figure A.51 \u2013 Interface reference management domain. A.5.10 Management functions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
110<\/td>\n | Figure A.52 \u2013 Management functions. A.5.11 Correspondences between Enterprise and Engineering specifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
111<\/td>\n | Figure A.53 \u2013 Example of correspondences between enterprise and engineering specifications. A.5.12 Correspondences between Computational and Engineering specifications Figure A.54 \u2013 Example of correspondences between computational and engineering specifications. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
112<\/td>\n | A.6 Technology specification in UML A.6.1 Overview Table A.5 \u2013 Technology language icons. A.6.2 Node configuration Figure A.55 \u2013 Node configuration overview. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
113<\/td>\n | A.6.3 Node structure Figure A.56 \u2013 Node structure. A.6.4 IXIT <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
114<\/td>\n | Figure A.57 \u2013 IXIT. A.6.5 Implementation Figure A.58 \u2013 Example of implementation process. A.6.6 Correspondences between engineering and technology specifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
115<\/td>\n | Figure A.59 \u2013 Example of correspondences between engineering and technology specifications. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
116<\/td>\n | Annex B An example of the representation of deontic concepts B.1 The scenario Figure B.1 \u2013 The community. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
117<\/td>\n | Figure B.2 \u2013 Basic behaviour. B.2 Expressing the deontic constraints Figure B.3 \u2013 Refined basic behaviour. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
118<\/td>\n | Figure B.4 \u2013 The Place Order interaction. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
119<\/td>\n | Figure B.5 \u2013 The Delegation interaction. Figure B.6 \u2013 The DeliverGoods interaction. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
120<\/td>\n | Figure B.7 \u2013 The Confirmation interaction. Figure B.8 \u2013 The Payment interaction. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" BS ISO\/IEC 19793 AMD1. Information technology. Open Distributed Processing. Use of UML for ODP system specifications<\/b><\/p>\n |